Padleducks logo Paddleducks name

Welcome to Paddleducks..... The home of paddle steamer modelling enthusiasts from around the world.



+-

Main Menu

Home
About Us
Forum
Photo Gallery
Links
Contact Us

UserBox

Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 
Forgot your password?

Search



Advanced Search

Author Topic: P.S. Waverley --- My Build  (Read 160560 times)

Offline Tug--Kenny

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 634
  • Gender: Male
Re: P.S. Waverley --- My Build
« Reply #75 on: June 20, 2008, 06:01:13 AM »

I then moved on to the paddle boxes and scrapped the two wooden versions I was building, all in the name of lightness. I have gone over to plastic and have made the top and bottom walkways for both sides and glued the on. (97) (98) (99)

This is the latest position at the moment, so I am taking a break for a week.  :vacation  (100)

Thanks for listening

Ken

Despite the high cost of living,
                    it still remains popular.

Offline Eddy Matthews

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5042
  • Gender: Male
Re: P.S. Waverley --- My Build
« Reply #76 on: June 20, 2008, 06:41:54 AM »
A heck of a lot of work done in a very short time Ken -  So you probably need a break for a while now :)

It certainly is starting to come together and look the part now, a superb job...... Just remember September 21st is getting closer  :whistle

Eddy
~ Never, ever, argue with an idiot. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you with experience ~

Offline Channel

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 312
  • Gender: Male
Re: P.S. Waverley --- My Build
« Reply #77 on: June 20, 2008, 08:14:45 AM »
Must be nice being retired Kenny!

Enjoy Poole!

Chris

Offline mjt60a

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1698
  • Gender: Male
Re: P.S. Waverley --- My Build
« Reply #78 on: June 20, 2008, 08:49:19 AM »
Did anyone notice that, before the new 'rivetted' funnels, waverleys forward funnel leaned back at a noticeably different angle compared to the aft one!
Posted by Mick.
(.....gonna need a bigger boat.....)

Offline Channel

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 312
  • Gender: Male
Re: P.S. Waverley --- My Build
« Reply #79 on: June 20, 2008, 09:05:02 AM »
Which boiler change led to the funnels going back wrongly ? Post 1975 ?

Chris

Offline mjt60a

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1698
  • Gender: Male
Re: P.S. Waverley --- My Build
« Reply #80 on: June 20, 2008, 09:15:58 AM »
I couldn't say, I first saw waverley in 1986 and they were like that then. They were welded funnels and I'd read somewhere that the forward one had been fitted first (to replace an older welded one) as the original was the more rusted of the two, then the aft one was replaced the following year - and the replacement had been built 'not quite the same'
Posted by Mick.
(.....gonna need a bigger boat.....)

Offline mjt60a

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1698
  • Gender: Male
Re: P.S. Waverley --- My Build
« Reply #81 on: June 20, 2008, 09:39:31 AM »
I've been looking for a photo showing the funnels and how (where, exactly) they attach to the bases (fiddleys?) but couldn't find the disc at the moment. However, here's a pic of my plans and as I suspected, the forward funnel sits at the front of its eliptical base and the aft one at the rear of its base (it says the plan is of the 1982 layout but I don't think this detail has ever changed)
**found one... the photo shows what I mean. not shown on the (my) plans are the hatches in the 'unused' part of the funnel bases
« Last Edit: June 20, 2008, 10:06:53 AM by mjt60a »
Posted by Mick.
(.....gonna need a bigger boat.....)

Daryl

  • Guest
Re: P.S. Waverley --- My Build
« Reply #82 on: June 21, 2008, 12:58:18 AM »
According to the book I have on her history, one of the funnels was replaced during one of her many re-fits, I can't remember which one, but the replacement funnel was made of a thicker gauge metal, making it heavier. The result was the deck sank slightly resulting one of the funnels having a greater rake than the other one.

It all sounds a bit odd, but the book was written and published by the trust which owns her so I can only assume the information in there is correct.

Daryl

sandystrone

  • Guest
Re: P.S. Waverley --- My Build
« Reply #83 on: June 21, 2008, 06:55:54 PM »
This photo I took in 1973 shows the angles of the funnels.

sandystrone

  • Guest
Re: P.S. Waverley --- My Build
« Reply #84 on: June 21, 2008, 07:04:57 PM »
Is this photo any help, Ken

Offline Tug--Kenny

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 634
  • Gender: Male
Re: P.S. Waverley --- My Build
« Reply #85 on: June 29, 2008, 01:37:42 AM »

I'm back from the old holidays.

Thank you for the pictures of the funnels, Sandy. I might make the front one on a pivot to operate either parallel or tilted back, depending on where I am. ;)


I went into Westbourne Models for £160 worth of gear and there seems to be some confusion as to the scale of my Waverley. I assumed it was 1/48 as the model is 59 inches long. Can anyone confirm this please.

I was buying portholes and used the measurement from my ships plans of the circles shown. This diameter is  7mm  and hopefully is the hole size for the portholes. There would then be an outside diameter of the ring around the glass, thus making them appear larger. As they only had 8mm & 10mm & 12mm in stock, these were bought to try on the model.
It was quoted that at my scale, some of the portholes would be 2 foot across !!  ???

This also got me concerned when it came to some companionways. Mine measure 20mm wide, but the available ones looked awful chunky ?  so I've bought some different sizes to compare with the hull when I got home.

We should be alright with motor, as I've selected an MFA type with gear reduction of 50-1.

I notice the prices have increased with model gear lately and it's getting a bit much. I shall be following the 'scratch' route a bit more in the future. methinks !!

Must get on with the build. Thanks for listening.

Ken




 
Despite the high cost of living,
                    it still remains popular.

Offline mjt60a

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1698
  • Gender: Male
Re: P.S. Waverley --- My Build
« Reply #86 on: June 29, 2008, 07:18:26 AM »
my method for portholes is this; buy some brass tube of the correct size and cut lots of pieces using a tube cutter (special miniature one, proops do them) then file the ends flat (ie de-burr them) then place them on a tray made of clear plastic type stuff as used for packaging for  asda/morrisons/tesco apple turnovers (indeed, most electrical components supplied in 'blister packs' such as video connections etc).... also cut enough small squares of the same plastic to cover each porthole individually.
purchase a can of clear casting resin and some hardener and mix a small amount, pour some into each porthole, allowing it to set and seal the brass rings to the plastic. then mix up some more and fill each one until the resin forms a 'dome' on top. allow time for the air bubbles to escape before placing a square of plastic on each porthole and pressing it down so it's in contact with the brass (unfortunately I don't think I have any photos of this process but it's fairly straightforward..)
when the resin is set HARD (about 2 days later) peel off the plastic squares and remove the portholes from the tray. chip away any excess resin from the outsides with a stanley knife and they're ready to use!
I'd now push them into holes drilled to take the brass tube so they're flush with the hull and run araldite all around the inside (of the hull) edges of the portholes to ensure a watertight seal.
rivets can be simulated by drilling 8 holes around the porthole-hole and araldite pieces of rod into them, this can be filed almost to nothing before painting and THEN adding the portholes.
For portholes on superstructure (where the flange is outside the ship) I use paper thin styrene sheet. Cut out a disc about 2mm radius larger than the porthole (use a piece of brass tube which has been sharpened by filing, press into the styrene on a base of scrap balsa or an old eraser) then cut a hole in the centre to form a ring (use a piece of the same tube used for the portholes) simulate rivets by pressing a centrepunch into the back of the styrene ring and glue onto the ship with the raised rivets facing out. Paint and then add the portholes.
Here's a couple of pics of the finished result...
Posted by Mick.
(.....gonna need a bigger boat.....)

Offline Eddy Matthews

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5042
  • Gender: Male
Re: P.S. Waverley --- My Build
« Reply #87 on: June 29, 2008, 08:18:50 AM »
Your hull is definately 1/48 scale Ken - or as near as makes no difference.... Waverley is 240 feet long, so 240/48 = 5 feet (or 60").

Regards
Eddy
~ Never, ever, argue with an idiot. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you with experience ~

Offline derekwarner_decoy

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2627
  • Gender: Male
  • Wollongong - Australia
Re: P.S. Waverley --- My Build
« Reply #88 on: June 29, 2008, 11:03:53 AM »
Hi PD's....Ken...some model supplier manufacturers quote the glass diameter as the porthole size & some offer the outer bezel diameter as the size...which is pretty bl~~dy   :crash stupid

Some manufacturers quote complete with a glass disk....but how could Super Glu melt glass?  :ranting

Waverley has so many portholes....they need to be totally uniform to look the part

One of the confusing points about model scale is.......a typical hand rail staunchen post @ 1:48 for a river vessel will be of totally different height to a 1:48 scale ocean vessel

Try the 'Robbe' brand...I think you will find the real diameter porthole sizing you are after also real glass disks & negate the nominated scale

You are doing a great build :clap - Derek
Derek Warner

Honorary Secretary [Retired]
Illawarra Live Steamers Co-op
Australia
www.ils.org.au

Offline derekwarner_decoy

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2627
  • Gender: Male
  • Wollongong - Australia
Re: P.S. Waverley --- My Build
« Reply #89 on: June 29, 2008, 08:45:22 PM »
Hi PD's...just going back one step  :sorry...with Waverley having so many portholes on near waterline by splash  :hammer...who would want the vessels watertight integrity left to SUPERGLOOED glass disks in brass frames...or brass porthole frames secured to the hull in a similar manner?  :nono

Derek Warner

Honorary Secretary [Retired]
Illawarra Live Steamers Co-op
Australia
www.ils.org.au

 

Powered by EzPortal