Hi Sandy,
Talk about trying to confuse me, my eyeballs swapped over when I was trying to envisage what you had said.
I don't know if there is a standard for rotation in steam engines, but in all the years I was building model boats, the standard was to have the motor (or engine) turning anticlockwise when viewed from the front (the end that connects to the shaft), so that the propeller was always trying to screw itself onto the shaft rather than off.
With reference to threads, in the early days of my career concerned with aircraft I used to work on helicopters that were designed by Sikorsky and built under licence by Westlands Helicopters in the UK. The thread problems were horrendous. Almost every thread invented were used on them, avionics used B.A. , but almost all threads in general use on the aircraft if it was smaller than 1/4" (approx 6.4mm)it would be B.A., but it could under special circumstances be BSF or BSW, above this size it all depended what it was screwing into, into steel it was generally BSF, into aluminium or magnesium BSW, until you came to gearboxes, which were most probably sourced from the US were all unified. There were high tensile, low tensile, shouldered, predrilled, this list went on and on, All bolts carried their coding on the top of the head eg, three rings for unified, can't remember the rest, old age I suppose. The stores system to cater for all this (no computers in those days, we were still using abacus) was enormous, there would be a 6"x6" (150mmx150mm) drawer containing just one or two small screws, almost every screwed hole on the aircraft had its own type of bolt to go into it, and every bolt had to have its own draw, god knows what propulsion and armaments people had to contend with. Thank god for standardization.