Welcome to Paddleducks..... The home of paddle steamer modelling enthusiasts from around the world.
Home
Help
Login
Register
Paddleducks
»
Forum
»
Other Marine Models
»
Live steam
(Moderators:
Eddy Matthews
,
DamienG
,
rendrag
) »
DeSchelde Conversion......
Main Menu
Home
About Us
Forum
Photo Gallery
Links
Contact Us
UserBox
Welcome,
Guest
.
Please
login
or
register
.
Login:
Password:
Login for:
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Forgot your password?
Search
Advanced Search
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
] |
Go Down
Author
Topic: DeSchelde Conversion...... (Read 7546 times)
derekwarner_decoy
Senior Member
Posts: 2627
Gender:
Wollongong - Australia
DeSchelde Conversion......
«
on:
October 22, 2011, 11:47:53 AM »
Hi PD's........a number of members will know of my [10 year] SLOW
completion skills with my 1/24 stand off scale PS Decoy.........however I have committed to make a 1/2 life conversion of the hull into a 1/12 stand off scale PS DeSchelde.......a mythical/mystical vessel from old ...to achieve this a number of radical steps must be taken
1. lower the hull deck by ~~~30 mm
2. remove the sponsons & relocate ~~~105 mm FWD & 30 mm lower than current position
3. Saito engine paddle shaft axis ~~~ 105 mm FWD & 30 mm lower than current position
4. total change of the boiler/engine/ ancillaries foot print with the boiler now AFT of the engine
5. major structural revisions to the hull planking above the waterline
6. the repositioning of components dictates that I will have many longer tube/pipe runs........but I can cope with that
The principal reason for the vessel conversion is to have a fully open & viewable boiler & engine room..........
...as I could not cope
with hiding the engine & boiler away below deck
I have uploaded a few images of the revised boiler/engine/ ancillaries foot print in the Photo gallery this morning.........naturally the components are just sitting on the engine & boiler plate above deck level....they will be lowered into the hull in due course
I just hope I don't get run over by a bus before I complete the task......
Following is an image of DeSchelde.......Derek
«
Last Edit: October 22, 2011, 08:42:16 PM by derekwarner_decoy
»
Logged
Derek Warner
Honorary Secretary [Retired]
Illawarra Live Steamers Co-op
Australia
www.ils.org.au
Harold H. Duncan
Guest
Re: DeSchelde Conversion......
«
Reply #1 on:
October 22, 2011, 05:17:51 PM »
Nice concept Derek.
Best of luck with the conversion, and hope to see plenty of photos here please.
An interesting concept, and should show off the engine and boiler nicely
well done
kiwi
Logged
derekwarner_decoy
Senior Member
Posts: 2627
Gender:
Wollongong - Australia
Re: DeSchelde Conversion......
«
Reply #2 on:
April 18, 2018, 10:37:29 PM »
April 2018 - 4.8:1 Chain Reduction and major modification for the Saito Y2DR engine entablature to accept the chain pinion which is now on the paddle shaft axis....mock up with real components below....................
So De Schelde was not mythical or mystical ...just very little recorded history
.................Derek
https://doctorferlemanstravels.wordpress.com/listspersons/othershipscrews/steamerdeschelde/
«
Last Edit: April 18, 2018, 10:52:34 PM by derekwarner_decoy
»
Logged
Derek Warner
Honorary Secretary [Retired]
Illawarra Live Steamers Co-op
Australia
www.ils.org.au
kno3
Full Member
Posts: 345
Gender:
Re: DeSchelde Conversion......
«
Reply #3 on:
May 02, 2018, 08:27:11 AM »
Why exactly do you need that chain reduction?
Your engine should be powerful enough without it. Besides, having the engine directly drive the paddlewheels would lower the rpm and thus the steam consumption.
Logged
derekwarner_decoy
Senior Member
Posts: 2627
Gender:
Wollongong - Australia
Re: DeSchelde Conversion......
«
Reply #4 on:
May 02, 2018, 10:43:03 PM »
Hullo Calan....trust you are well
The initial breakaway pressure and resistance to
smoothly
accelerate 890gm of paddle shaft including wheels, all on axis with the 4.00mm diameter SAITO output shaft ...from ZERO to say 50 RPM was beyond the ability of the drive
This [breakaway and massive over speed] occured both with warm engine or cold engine conditions
This has required the long &
total hands up in the air
of how to incorporate
within
the Y2DR engine frame or footprint to incorporate nominal 5:1 mechanical speed reduction to the final output paddle shaft speed .....this has hopefully been achieved with approximate 58% increase in paddle shaft from 4.00mm to 6.35mm diameter....
Derek
«
Last Edit: May 02, 2018, 10:56:36 PM by derekwarner_decoy
»
Logged
Derek Warner
Honorary Secretary [Retired]
Illawarra Live Steamers Co-op
Australia
www.ils.org.au
kno3
Full Member
Posts: 345
Gender:
Re: DeSchelde Conversion......
«
Reply #5 on:
May 06, 2018, 01:26:25 AM »
I'm confused now...
Are you saying that the Saito engine wasn't powerful enough for direct drive, or that is was spinning the paddlewheels too fast?
Logged
derekwarner_decoy
Senior Member
Posts: 2627
Gender:
Wollongong - Australia
Re: DeSchelde Conversion......
«
Reply #6 on:
May 06, 2018, 06:55:13 AM »
kno3
...the Saito Y2DR has ample torque and power to spin the 890gm of paddle shaft including wheels, it was however impossible to smoothly accelerate the mass from ZERO to moderate speeds [50 to 70 RPM].............. Derek
Logged
Derek Warner
Honorary Secretary [Retired]
Illawarra Live Steamers Co-op
Australia
www.ils.org.au
Hankwilliams
Senior Member
Posts: 932
Gender:
Re: DeSchelde Conversion......
«
Reply #7 on:
May 06, 2018, 09:21:15 AM »
Hi Derek and kno3,
it`s not only my experience, that for direct driving you need a real long stoke engine. Stroke between 20 to 30% of wheel diameter should be ideal.
Thomas
Logged
kno3
Full Member
Posts: 345
Gender:
Re: DeSchelde Conversion......
«
Reply #8 on:
May 06, 2018, 05:42:20 PM »
I see what you mean Derek. However, did you do the test under steam and with the paddlewheels in water? Because the engine would behave differently from a test on the bench.
Logged
derekwarner_decoy
Senior Member
Posts: 2627
Gender:
Wollongong - Australia
Re: DeSchelde Conversion......
«
Reply #9 on:
May 07, 2018, 11:06:49 AM »
Hi Calan.......
The test was under steam, however with a wooden clothes peg around the 4mm diameter shaft to simulate the load of water
Naturally this was difficult to understand any reality of clothes peg force, but suffice to say it was far more controllable and less painful than my burning thumb & forefinger
I also note the comment from Thomas re engine stroke to wheel diameter ratio ....and so my Saito engine at 20mm stroke falls rather short of this 20% to 30% ratio
Using scale values, a 1:20 scale paddle shaft should be rotating in the vicinity of 200+ RPM......this I have seen on other models with scale surface area paddles......and whilst it may be true scale, some appear similar to food blenders making a lot of bubbles & wash......but going nowhere fast
So to counter or control the engine speed from ZERO, I concluded a paddle shaft speed reduction [like quite a number of OZ Murray River paddlers] as a way to harness the initial engine torque
I had the 10 tooth & 48 tooth chain pinions unused from 15 years ago...so have designed a few modifications around these components for the drive
As previously mentioned, the 4mm engine crankshaft ...being the paddle shaft has been increased to 6.25mm
Somewhere down the track, the paddle wheels will be fitted with fixed wooden float blades.....increasing or decreasing the height x length of these wooden floats will be a very simple task, as the final tuning of paddle speed relative to resistance of the water
The second image is just a mock up of the paddle shaft with the 48 tooth pinion & some shaft bearing housings......the final number of bearings will be six [6]....[the flexible shaft coupling shown will not be used......they are not to scale & also exhibit a disappointing degree of axial eccentricity]
This is all again relative to that Bus as mentioned in October 23, 2011, 12:47:53 AM ยป
Derek
«
Last Edit: May 07, 2018, 11:53:20 AM by derekwarner_decoy
»
Logged
Derek Warner
Honorary Secretary [Retired]
Illawarra Live Steamers Co-op
Australia
www.ils.org.au
Hankwilliams
Senior Member
Posts: 932
Gender:
Re: DeSchelde Conversion......
«
Reply #10 on:
May 08, 2018, 05:48:26 PM »
Hi Derek,
your power plant gives a mechanically good impression. But it is not very suitable, to simulate the power of resistance of water with appliance like clothes-pegs. Probably with 1 : 4,8 gear reduction your power plant will be satisfactory in water - may be the rotation of the engine will be high and therefore also steam consumption. One must test...The attraction of our passion is groundet in try and error until the result is satisfactory. What`s the diameter of the wheels?
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
] |
Go Up
« previous
next »
Paddleducks
»
Forum
»
Other Marine Models
»
Live steam
(Moderators:
Eddy Matthews
,
DamienG
,
rendrag
) »
DeSchelde Conversion......
Powered by
EzPortal